Motorola Moto G6 Xt1925 32gb Dual Sim (Factory Unlocked) Android Gsm 12mp 57 Review

Motorola Moto G6 Smartphone Review

G as in genius? The latest offshoot of the Motorola-G series is advertised self-confidently and presents itself as a successful advancement of the Moto G5s. A faster SoC, a dual camera, and an updated design are supposed to attract customers. You tin can find out nigh the qualities and weaknesses of the Moto smartphone in this examination.

With this yr'southward Moto Yard, Motorola introduces the sixth generation of the midrange smartphone, also changing from the 16:9 to the ii:1 format of the brandish. A dual photographic camera and a newer processor are also added now. Compared to the Moto G5s the storage equipment has remained unchanged in our test unit, offering three GB of working memory and 32 GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a microSD card. Amazon also has an sectional offer for a model with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. The following tabular array shows the differences betwixt the Motorola Moto G6 (XT1925-5), its predecessor, and the 2 other models of the serial, the Moto G6 Plus and Moto G6 Play.

. Moto G6 Moto G5s Moto G6 Play Moto G6 Plus
Display v.seven in, 2:1, IPS, 2160x1080 pixels, Gorilla Glass 3 five.2 in, 16:ix, IPS, 1920x1080 pixels, Gorilla Drinking glass three 5.vii in, ii:1, IPS, 1440x720 pixels, standard drinking glass 5.ix in, 2:i, IPS, 2160x1080 pixels, Gorilla Glass 3
SoC Snapdragon 450 Snapdragon 430 Snapdragon 430 Snapdragon 630
RAM 3 GB 3 GB 3 GB four GB
Storage 32 GB 32 GB 32 GB 64 GB
Bone Android viii.0 Android vii.1 Android 8.0 Android 8.0
Battery 3000 mAh 3000 mAh 4000 mAh 3200 mAh
Main camera 12 + five MP (f/i.viii) 16 MP (f/2.0) xiii MP (f/2.0) 12 + 5 MP (f/1.7, DPAF)
Front camera eight MP five MP eight MP 8 MP
USB USB two.0, Blazon C USB 2.0, Micro-USB USB two.0, Micro-USB USB 2.0, Blazon C
Price 249 Euros (~$298; ~$250 in the US) 249 Euros (~$298) 199 Euros (~$238) 299 Euros (~$357)

The Moto G half-dozen is advertised with the tagline "Premium for Everyone." Those are big words for a relatively affordable smartphone, which we are comparison confronting competitors of the same price range in our test. Foremost, at that place is the ZTE Blade V9, which offers very like equipment with the same SoC, followed by the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), the Honor 9 Calorie-free, and the Nokia 6 (2018). Smartphones such every bit the BQ Aquaris X Pro that were expensive at some point are simply marginally more expensive at the time of this exam.

Brandish

5.70 inch two:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multitouch points, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, sleeky: yes

Weight

167 k ( = v.89 oz / 0.37 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may employ components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Instance - Motorola has turned away from aluminum

At its market introduction, the Motorola Moto G6 is simply offered in the Deep Indigo color, which is a deep blue that looks nearly black in dark environments. The manufacturer specifies a height of 8.iii mm (~0.33 in) for the smartphone, which corresponds to our measurements. The camera protrudes past exactly one mm (~0.04 in).

The front and back are made of Corning Gorilla Glass 3. The back is rounded on the sides, which makes the smartphone fit into the paw comfortably. However, the option of materials makes it susceptible to fingerprints and slightly slippery. On surfaces that are not level, the Moto G6 tends to slide off easily.

The workmanship is good. The glass is framed by a solid plastic frame which looks like metal due to its shiny NCVM covering. Only the gaps in front between the dissimilar materials seem a niggling too noticeable. While the phone does not react to any attempts at twisting it, stronger pressure level on the panel results in the brandish of visible waves.

The bombardment of the Moto G6 is congenital-in, and the P2i splash h2o protection ensures that calorie-free pelting cannot impairment the smartphone.

Size Comparison

153.eight mm / six.06 inch 72.three mm / 2.85 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 167 g 0.3682 lbs 152.v mm / 6 inch 74.eight mm / 2.94 inch eight mm / 0.315 inch 181 g 0.399 lbs 150 mm / five.91 inch 73.v mm / 2.89 inch ix.5 mm / 0.374 inch 157 one thousand 0.3461 lbs 151.4 mm / v.96 inch lxx.6 mm / two.78 inch 7.v mm / 0.2953 inch 153 m 0.3373 lbs 151 mm / 5.94 inch 71.ix mm / 2.83 inch vii.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 149 g 0.3285 lbs 148.8 mm / 5.86 inch 75.eight mm / 2.98 inch viii.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 175 chiliad 0.3858 lbs 146.v mm / 5.77 inch 72.seven mm / 2.86 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 158 g 0.3483 lbs

Features - Moto smartphone with USB Type-C and radio

Our exam unit of measurement of the Motorola Moto G6 is a dual-SIM smartphone. It is a plus since the use of a second Nano-SIM card does non prevent you from using a microSD card. Storage cards are officially supported up to 128 GB. Since the SDXC standard has already produced larger models, those should also work without any trouble. However, you cannot format a microSD every bit an internal storage. Anyone needing to install and move apps onto the storage carte must first enable this in the developer options.

Every bit one of the few smartphones of its cost range, information technology already has a Blazon-C USB connection. This still transfers at the 2.0 standard and also masters OTG, so that external storage and input devices can also be connected to the Moto G6. In improver, the Motorola phone has an NFC bit, a radio receiver, also as Bluetooth 4.two with aptX HD support.

Software - Android 8.0 Oreo and useful features

Google Android 8.0 Oreo is used as the operating organisation. The manufacturer has only modified the visuals minimally. This is accompanied by the well-known Moto app, which offers suggestions for usage and boosted features such every bit gesture navigation, Moto Key, notification display, as well as its own voice navigation. While that does not run quite as fast equally Google Banana for instance, its privacy protection regulations are better defined. Lenovo claims that it will even keep the privacy protection standards when the information is transferred to countries that have lower legal standards. The voice recognition itself works quite reliably, but often needs a moment when a command should be implemented in an app. In addition, vocalization tin can as well be used to unlock the smartphone.

At the time of this test, the Google security patches are on the level of March ane, 2018 and thus adequately electric current. Another positive aspect is that the user account command is implemented in the system. Motorola has also preinstalled the LinkedIn and Microsoft Outlook apps, which tin be deactivated in the Settings, though.

Communication and GPS - Standstill since the Moto G5

The Snapdragon 450 in the Motorola Moto G6 has a Qualcomm X9-LTE modem on board, which nominally would be able to support LTE Cat. 7. Nonetheless, Lenovo has decided to only offering LTE Cat. 4, which enables a maximum of 150 MBit/southward during downloads and 50 MBit/s during uploads. Although this is completely sufficient for everyday life and offers quite a wide support of frequency bands, the providers already support college transfer rates. The mobile reception was inconspicuous in the mature net of a large metropolis.

The WLAN module of the Moto G6 masters the IEEE-802.xi a/b/m/n standards and is able to utilise the ii.4 as well equally the 5.0-GHz net. While the transfer rates to our Linksys EA8500 reference router are slightly to a higher place the average, the range of the WLAN connection is non very far. Fifty-fifty a few meters from the router, downloads take noticeably longer and the reaction times also become slower. If there is a wall between the smartphone and the Access Point, it can happen that the connection drops entirely.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of grade Smartphone
(5.59 - 1599, n=255, final 2 years)

480 MBit/s ∼100% +325%

Nokia six 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Wink

345 MBit/s ∼72% +205%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash

280 MBit/s ∼58% +148%

BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash

148 MBit/s ∼31% +31%

Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash

113 MBit/south ∼24%

Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

111 MBit/southward ∼23% -2%

Honor ix Low-cal
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Wink

49.nine MBit/s ∼10% -56%

ZTE Blade V9
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash

MBit/s ∼0% -100%

iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
(xv.five - 1414, north=255, concluding 2 years)

468 MBit/south ∼100% +314%

Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Wink

289 MBit/s ∼62% +156%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Republic of mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash

251 MBit/s ∼54% +122%

BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash

242 MBit/southward ∼52% +114%

Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Wink

121 MBit/south ∼26% +vii%

Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash

113 MBit/due south ∼24%

Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash

52.6 MBit/due south ∼11% -53%

ZTE Blade V9
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash

MBit/south ∼0% -100%

The Lenovo smartphone supports the GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou satellite networks. To fix on a satellite already takes virtually five seconds outdoors, which is relatively long. On the other hand, it is authentic up to iii meters (ten ft). Indoors, this can take more than than one-and-a-one-half minutes, and the location accuracy then varies betwixt 65 and 258 meters (~230-836 ft).

While this does not brand usa specially optimistic for the practise test on the bicycle, the Motorola phone positively surprises the states and is able to quite convince us with its recorded route. Even if it does not always stay exactly on the traversed road, it nonetheless offers a more than decent performance and in parts is fifty-fifty more accurate than the Garmin Edge 500.

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality

Equally telephone app, the Moto G6 as well uses the standard app from Google, which offers the usual comfort and clear overview.

We like the phone call qualities of the Motorola smartphone very much, and the three microphones ensure an effective noise suppression fifty-fifty when using the speaker way. The voice quality is likewise very adept. Holding information technology to your ear, your voice also as that of your chat partner are transferred clearly. Only when using the speaker, the vox of the G6 user is echoing slightly. However, you can notwithstanding hear it well if the speaker sits at a little altitude from the phone and does not speak too quietly.

The Moto G6 supports VoLTE as well as VoWifi.

Cameras - The dual photographic camera of the Moto Chiliad convinces

Picture taken indoors with front camera of the Moto G6 with activated Beauty Mode
Front camera image

Compared to the Moto G5s, the front camera has improved and now offers 8 Megapixels. Added to this are a Dazzler Style and even an LED light in font for dark surroundings. Videos can exist recorded at 1080p (30 FPS) at all-time and are not stabilized. The picture quality is quite decent and the beautification of the subject is not exaggerated.

Different its predecessor, the Moto G6 now uses a dual photographic camera. The second camera serves to create pictures with Bokeh effects. While the resolution of the main camera has decreased to 12 MP, the camera is now more light sensitive with an discontinuity of f/1.8. The strength of the Bokeh upshot tin exist controlled via an onscreen slider. Anyone who exaggerates this will go a very blurry picture in virtually cases. Most of the time, fifty% or less is entirely sufficient and produce a presentable effect.

Nosotros similar the photographic camera performance during daylight. Due to the automatic HDR mode, you can easily produce pictures that accept a relatively high dynamic range, and the reproduced colors are stiff and saturated. Competitors such as the Galaxy J7 or the Accolade 9 Lite cannot quite proceed upwards with this. Nonetheless, there is a small hitch, since the shutter speed of the Moto G6 is relatively dull. With moving targets in detail, some pictures go amiss. In weak light conditions, the colors of the pictures appear slightly slow. Yet, the degree of particular is the highest of the comparison field and considering its toll range, the Motorola smartphone does adequately well.

Videos are recorded at a maximum of Total HD with up to 60 images per 2nd. However, we do not recommend this, since you can then already run across some minor artifacts on the screen. In addition, prototype stabilization is only available up to thirty FPS. The sound is recorded in stereo, and the racket level is relatively low.

Epitome Comparison

Cull a scene and navigate inside the first epitome. 1 click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera (portrait mode)

Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with master photographic camera (portrait way) full resolution

Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera while driving

Motorola Moto G6: Paradigm taken with main camera while driving full resolution

ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.

Nosotros perform further tests of the dual camera of the Moto G6 under controlled light weather. The ColorChecker shows the stronger saturation of the reproduced colors well. In addition, they are slightly brightened, and the skin tones show a slight red tint.

In the directly comparison of the reproduction in the center of the image, the Motorola smartphone as well shows a good functioning, and only the Galaxy J7 is able to reproduce the details fifty-fifty amend. When looking at the test nautical chart as a whole, the Moto G6 also delivers a decent operation. However, the colour transitions show pocket-sized artifacts, and the edges of the letters easily become rather frayed.

Moto G6
Moto G6

Moto G6

Galaxy J7
Galaxy J7

Galaxy J7

Honor 9 Lite
Honor ix Lite

Honor 9 Lite

Blade V9
Blade V9

Blade V9

Accessories and Warranty

Moto G6 with accessories
Moto G6 with accessories

The Motorola Moto G6 comes with a modular fast-charger (5 V, 3 A; 9 V, 1.6 A; 12 V, 1.2 A), a USB cable (Blazon-A to Type-C), a tool to open the carte tray, a gel comprehend, a Quick Beginning Guide, and a warranty booklet.

Anyone ordering directly from Motorola will too receive a wireless Motorola Pulse Escape+ headset. However, this campaign is accompanied by the proclamation, "as long as it is in stock," so information technology may non exist available for long.

Motorola offers 24 months of warranty for the smartphone. Please see ourGuarantees, Render policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.

Input Devices and Operation

The capacitive touchscreen of the Motorola Moto G6 recognizes up to x simultaneous touch on points. The Corning Gorilla Glass 3 surface offers good sliding characteristics and reacts to input quickly and precisely. Google'southward GBoard is preinstalled as the standard keyboard layout. If necessary, this can be easily replaced by some other layout from the Play Shop.

The fingerprint sensor on the front recognizes the saved fingerprints reliably and after unlocking the phone,straight brings the user to the habitation screen or the still open app. Furthermore, the sensor can also replace the Android onscreen keys via using gestures. While we would recommend against using unlocking via vocalisation since it can be hands circumvented, information technology worked quite reliably during our test. In addition, you can utilize face up recognition. Even in good light weather, this takes a long second to unlock the smartphone, and in some cases just did nothing. In the night, it did not piece of work at all, since the lite of the display is apparently not sufficient to recognize the user.

Display - Smartphone with a bright IPS display

Subpixel grid
Subpixel filigree

The Motorola Moto G6 is the first smartphone of the Moto-G series that is equipped with a display in the 2:1 format. It measures 5.7 inches (xiv.48 cm) and with that is nominally 0.v inches larger than the panel of the Moto G5s. Due to the change of the format ratio, the actual proceeds in brandish surface turns out lower than suggested as you tin can see in the tabular array.

At this indicate, the resolution of 2160x1080 pixels corresponds to the standard in this device grade, delivering a high pixel density and sharpness. The brightness of the display is skillful and too at the level typical for the toll range. With the brightness sensor activated, nosotros tin even measure 612 cd/grand² in the centre of the display. If the brightness is measured with an fifty-fifty distribution of brilliant and dark areas, the effulgence drops by well-nigh 30 cd/m².

While the black value is decent, black areas announced more similar night gray. In this respect, the Milky way J7 has an advantage with its Super AMOLED panel, which tin reproduce absolute black. However, at 1162:1 the IPS-display of the Moto G6 nevertheless achieves a skillful dissimilarity ratio.

The manufacturer uses Pulse Width Modulation to dim the brandish, merely since its frequency is extremely high, nearly users will non exist disturbed by it or even be able to perceive it. In that location is likewise a blueish light filter to protect the eyes when using information technology late at nighttime.

Model Moto G6 Moto G5s Nokia 6 5.7 in (16:nine)
Display area 83.84 cm² (13 in²) 74.54 cm² (xi.5 in²) 83.39 cm² (12.9 in²) 89.57 cm² (13.9 in²)
462
cd/chiliad²
486
cd/yard²
477
cd/thou²
475
cd/1000²
488
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
480
cd/grand²
486
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 477.6 cd/one thousand² Minimum: 12.96 cd/thou²
Effulgence Distribution: 95 %
Centre on Bombardment: 488 cd/m²
Contrast: 1162:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color three.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.four
ΔE Greyscale 5.iii | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
94.8% sRGB (Calman 2d)
Gamma: 2.41

Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
ZTE Blade V9
IPS, 2160x1080, five.70
Honour nine Calorie-free
IPS, 2160x1080, five.65
Nokia six 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Milky way J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.fifty
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, v.20
Screen

-7%

-15%

viii%

-34%

20%

-44%

Effulgence middle

488

490

0%

459

-6%

627

28%

417

-15%

454

-7%

458

-6%

Effulgence

478

502

5%

437

-9%

622

30%

421

-12%

463

-3%

473

-i%

Effulgence Distribution

95

92

-three%

90

-5%

82

-14%

88

-7%

86

-ix%

88

-vii%

Blackness Level *

0.42

0.43

-2%

0.62

-48%

0.41

2%

0.61

-45%

0.51

-21%

Contrast

1162

1140

-2%

740

-36%

1529

32%

684

-41%

898

-23%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

3.9

5.7

-46%

4.5

-15%

4.5

-15%

6.1

-56%

2

49%

vii.1

-82%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

half dozen.8

7.viii

-15%

seven.3

-7%

7

-iii%

xi.two

-65%

5.3

22%

14.5

-113%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

5.3

4.7

eleven%

4.9

8%

five.1

4%

vii.1

-34%

1.7

68%

10.five

-98%

Gamma

2.41 91%

2.4 92%

2.17 101%

2.26 97%

2.16 102%

ii.one 105%

ii.28 96%

CCT

7146 91%

7526 86%

7261 90%

7201 90%

8362 78%

6394 102%

8951 73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply bicycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is as well low, users with sensitive optics may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 17 % effulgence setting

The brandish backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and beneath. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so nigh users sensitive to PWM should not notice whatsoever flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the brandish. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: v - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

We evaluate the color reproduction of the Moto G6 display with a photograph spectrometer and the CalMAN analysis software. The smartphone offers dissimilar setting options which give the user the choice betwixt a Normal and an Intensive mode. In addition, the color temperature can exist adjusted to Warm, Neutral, or Absurd. The default settings are Intensive/Neutral, which displays the contents in a very cool presentation, causing visible color deviations due to oversaturation. Anyone wanting a more than accurate colour reproduction on the display should choose the Normal/Warm settings. Even then, the presentation is all the same a bit too cool, but visibly more pleasant and the deviations are not quite as grave. The smartphone uses the sRGB colour space, without fully roofing information technology, yet.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times bear witness how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and tin can crusade moving objects to announced blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

Response Time Blackness to White
24 ms ... ascent ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows expert response rates in our tests, but may exist besides tedious for competitive gamers.
In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are meliorate.
This means that the measured response fourth dimension is like to the average of all tested devices (23.v ms).
Response Time fifty% Gray to 80% Grayness
37.2 ms ... rising ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 19.two ms fall
The screen shows ho-hum response rates in our tests and volition exist unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the boilerplate of all tested devices (37.i ms).

Outdoors, the Motorola Moto G6 benefits from its bright display, as long as the brightness sensor is activated. Although it always needs a brusque moment to adjust to a new lite status, information technology does its work reliably. Thus the contents still remain hands readable in very vivid environs. Only the very reflective surface of the display makes it difficult to see anything in straight sunlight.

The viewing bending stability of the IPS display in the Motorola Moto G6 is very good. We did not discover whatsoever colour distortions, and also the glow event that is typical for the IPS technology can but exist noticeable in very steep viewing angles.

Viewing angle stability of the Motorola Moto G6
Viewing angle stability of the Motorola Moto G6

Operation – Moto smartphone with the new Snapdragon 450

The Motorola Moto G6 uses the new Snapdragon 450, which has replaced its predecessor, the Snapdragon 430 from the Moto G5s. The big difference lies mainly in the manufacturing process. While the 430 series is still manufactured in the 28-nm size process, the new 450 uses xiv nm. Correspondingly, the clock speed of the eight Cortex-A53 cores can exist increased past 400 MHz to i.eight GHz, which is accompanied by a decent functioning increase. The GPU now comes from Qualcomm'southward Snapdragon 600 series and provides the G6 with an Adreno 506, which is also used in the Snapdragon 626 among others. This is accompanied by iii GB of working memory.

In the benchmarks, the Moto G6 delivers a decent performance that is at the same level as that of the ZTE Blade V9 which uses the same SoC. While at eighteen percent, the performance increase in the single core area is non quite as loftier every bit expected, it turns out significantly higher when using all the cores, increasing past seventy percent compared to the Moto G5s. The performance increase in the graphics benchmarks varies between 30 and lx per centum. The arrangement operation is not simply loftier subjectively, simply near approaches the level of a Snapdragon 630 in the PCMark.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

59454 Points ∼82%

Motorola Moto G5s

46370 Points ∼64% -22%

ZTE Blade V9

60077 Points ∼83% +1%

Award nine Lite

67727 Points ∼93% +fourteen%

Nokia half-dozen 2018

72580 Points ∼100% +22%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

47339 Points ∼65% -xx%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

66226 Points ∼91% +11%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=ten)

57703 Points ∼80% -3%

AnTuTu v7
Total Score (sort past value)
Motorola Moto G6

71352 Points ∼79%

ZTE Bract V9

71712 Points ∼79% +ane%

Honor 9 Light

89639 Points ∼99% +26%

Nokia 6 2018

90435 Points ∼100% +27%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

61811 Points ∼68% -13%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

82343 Points ∼91% +15%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)

69869 Points ∼77% -ii%

CPU (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

34408 Points ∼82%

ZTE Blade V9

33896 Points ∼81% -ane%

Honor 9 Lite

41874 Points ∼100% +22%

Nokia 6 2018

39585 Points ∼95% +15%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

32810 Points ∼78% -5%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

41767 Points ∼100% +21%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (33473 - 35092, n=xi)

34106 Points ∼81% -i%

PCMark for Android
Work functioning score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

5321 Points ∼51%

Motorola Moto G5s

4669 Points ∼45% -12%

ZTE Blade V9

4967 Points ∼48% -7%

Honor ix Lite

5887 Points ∼57% +11%

Nokia half dozen 2018

5484 Points ∼53% +3%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

4920 Points ∼47% -eight%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

5886 Points ∼57% +11%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=14)

5364 Points ∼52% +1%

Average of class Smartphone (3341 - 19989, due north=139, last 2 years)

10398 Points ∼100% +95%

Work 2.0 functioning score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

4552 Points ∼54%

Motorola Moto G5s

3604 Points ∼43% -21%

ZTE Bract V9

4401 Points ∼53% -3%

Honor 9 Lite

4911 Points ∼59% +8%

Nokia 6 2018

4719 Points ∼56% +four%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

3722 Points ∼44% -xviii%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

4915 Points ∼59% +eight%

Boilerplate Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, north=14)

4502 Points ∼54% -1%

Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=187, concluding 2 years)

8369 Points ∼100% +84%

BaseMark Os Ii
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

1069 Points ∼26%

Motorola Moto G5s

848 Points ∼21% -21%

ZTE Blade V9

1169 Points ∼29% +ix%

Honor ix Lite

1423 Points ∼35% +33%

Nokia 6 2018

1504 Points ∼37% +41%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

353 Points ∼9% -67%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

1314 Points ∼32% +23%

Boilerplate Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=xiv)

1083 Points ∼26% +1%

Average of class Smartphone (615 - 8124, n=193, last 2 years)

4099 Points ∼100% +283%

Organization (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

2560 Points ∼35%

Motorola Moto G5s

1553 Points ∼21% -39%

ZTE Blade V9

2772 Points ∼38% +8%

Honor ix Lite

3058 Points ∼42% +19%

Nokia 6 2018

3237 Points ∼44% +26%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

2368 Points ∼33% -vii%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

3492 Points ∼48% +36%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, due north=fourteen)

2736 Points ∼38% +7%

Average of grade Smartphone (1160 - 19657, n=193, last two years)

7285 Points ∼100% +185%

Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

770 Points ∼16%

Motorola Moto G5s

656 Points ∼14% -15%

ZTE Blade V9

962 Points ∼20% +25%

Honor nine Lite

1757 Points ∼37% +128%

Nokia 6 2018

1161 Points ∼24% +51%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

1265 Points ∼27% +64%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

1046 Points ∼22% +36%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=fourteen)

1058 Points ∼22% +37%

Average of course Smartphone (522 - 9044, northward=193, final 2 years)

4746 Points ∼100% +516%

Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

965 Points ∼14%

Motorola Moto G5s

723 Points ∼10% -25%

ZTE Blade V9

956 Points ∼14% -ane%

Honour nine Lite

859 Points ∼12% -eleven%

Nokia 6 2018

1520 Points ∼22% +58%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

533 Points ∼8% -45%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

1012 Points ∼15% +5%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 984, n=14)

962 Points ∼14% 0%

Average of class Smartphone (349 - 25642, n=193, last 2 years)

6895 Points ∼100% +615%

Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

688 Points ∼50%

Motorola Moto G5s

703 Points ∼51% +2%

ZTE Blade V9

731 Points ∼53% +6%

Honour 9 Lite

888 Points ∼65% +29%

Nokia six 2018

895 Points ∼65% +30%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

10 Points ∼1% -99%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

806 Points ∼59% +17%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 981, n=fourteen)

671 Points ∼49% -two%

Average of class Smartphone (679 - 2392, northward=193, concluding 2 years)

1367 Points ∼100% +99%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Fleck Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

743 Points ∼24%

Motorola Moto G5s

630 Points ∼21% -15%

ZTE Blade V9

769 Points ∼25% +three%

Honor nine Lite

945 Points ∼31% +27%

Nokia half-dozen 2018

883 Points ∼29% +19%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

736 Points ∼24% -one%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

928 Points ∼30% +25%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=thirteen)

761 Points ∼25% +2%

Average of class Smartphone (606 - 6984, north=65, final two years)

3071 Points ∼100% +313%

64 Fleck Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

3868 Points ∼44%

Motorola Moto G5s

2270 Points ∼26% -41%

ZTE Blade V9

3907 Points ∼44% +1%

Honor ix Lite

3730 Points ∼42% -four%

Nokia six 2018

4210 Points ∼47% +9%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

3777 Points ∼43% -two%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

4369 Points ∼49% +13%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13)

3862 Points ∼44% 0%

Boilerplate of class Smartphone (1556 - 15310, n=65, concluding 2 years)

8876 Points ∼100% +129%

Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

2777 Points ∼39%

Motorola Moto G5s

1871 Points ∼26% -33%

ZTE Blade V9

3157 Points ∼44% +14%

Honor 9 Calorie-free

3117 Points ∼43% +12%

Nokia half dozen 2018

3690 Points ∼51% +33%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

2371 Points ∼33% -fifteen%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10)

3146 Points ∼44% +xiii%

Average of class Smartphone (2810 - 11362, n=52, last ii years)

7208 Points ∼100% +160%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Tempest Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

12756 Points ∼xxx%

Motorola Moto G5s

9491 Points ∼22% -26%

ZTE Blade V9

12764 Points ∼30% 0%

Honor 9 Low-cal

12278 Points ∼29% -four%

Nokia six 2018

17030 Points ∼40% +34%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

8318 Points ∼19% -35%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

13963 Points ∼32% +ix%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 13203, n=12)

12801 Points ∼thirty% 0%

Average of form Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=128, last 2 years)

43017 Points ∼100% +237%

1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

12441 Points ∼20%

Motorola Moto G5s

9626 Points ∼fifteen% -23%

ZTE Blade V9

12482 Points ∼twenty% 0%

Honor 9 Light

11712 Points ∼19% -6%

Nokia half dozen 2018

18572 Points ∼30% +49%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

7456 Points ∼12% -40%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

13277 Points ∼21% +7%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12736, n=12)

12470 Points ∼20% 0%

Average of class Smartphone (2463 - 224130, north=128, last two years)

62949 Points ∼100% +406%

1280x720 offscreen Ice Tempest Unlimited Physics (sort past value)
Motorola Moto G6

13997 Points ∼58%

Motorola Moto G5s

9045 Points ∼38% -35%

ZTE Blade V9

13862 Points ∼58% -1%

Honor nine Light

14780 Points ∼62% +six%

Nokia vi 2018

13196 Points ∼55% -vi%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

12955 Points ∼54% -7%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

17044 Points ∼71% +22%

Boilerplate Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15273, n=12)

14216 Points ∼59% +2%

Boilerplate of form Smartphone (8324 - 59268, northward=128, terminal two years)

23969 Points ∼100% +71%

2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES iii.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

800 Points ∼23%

Motorola Moto G5s

555 Points ∼16% -31%

ZTE Blade V9

807 Points ∼23% +one%

Laurels 9 Lite

230 Points ∼vii% -71%

Nokia half dozen 2018

1332 Points ∼38% +67%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

340 Points ∼ten% -57%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

849 Points ∼24% +vi%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 829, n=fourteen)

812 Points ∼23% +two%

Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, northward=211, last 2 years)

3483 Points ∼100% +335%

2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES iii.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

690 Points ∼17%

Motorola Moto G5s

483 Points ∼12% -30%

ZTE Blade V9

697 Points ∼17% +1%

Honor nine Light

184 Points ∼5% -73%

Nokia half dozen 2018

1249 Points ∼31% +81%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

278 Points ∼7% -threescore%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

725 Points ∼18% +v%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, northward=14)

701 Points ∼17% +two%

Average of course Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=211, last two years)

4022 Points ∼100% +483%

2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES three.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

1803 Points ∼63%

Motorola Moto G5s

1158 Points ∼40% -36%

ZTE Blade V9

1813 Points ∼63% +1%

Accolade 9 Calorie-free

1788 Points ∼62% -ane%

Nokia half-dozen 2018

1733 Points ∼60% -4%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

1535 Points ∼53% -15%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

2127 Points ∼74% +eighteen%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1901, n=14)

1785 Points ∼62% -1%

Average of form Smartphone (677 - 5301, due north=211, last 2 years)

2873 Points ∼100% +59%

2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

442 Points ∼17%

Motorola Moto G5s

295 Points ∼11% -33%

ZTE Bract V9

444 Points ∼17% 0%

Honor 9 Low-cal

312 Points ∼12% -29%

Nokia 6 2018

814 Points ∼31% +84%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

247 Points ∼9% -44%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

464 Points ∼eighteen% +5%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (438 - 449, n=14)

443 Points ∼17% 0%

Boilerplate of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, north=207, terminal 2 years)

2632 Points ∼100% +495%

2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES three.one) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

363 Points ∼13%

Motorola Moto G5s

243 Points ∼9% -33%

ZTE Blade V9

365 Points ∼13% +i%

Honor 9 Calorie-free

253 Points ∼9% -30%

Nokia 6 2018

707 Points ∼26% +95%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

199 Points ∼7% -45%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

379 Points ∼fourteen% +iv%

Boilerplate Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (349 - 382, due north=fourteen)

365 Points ∼thirteen% +1%

Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, north=207, concluding ii years)

2748 Points ∼100% +657%

2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES three.1) Physics (sort past value)
Motorola Moto G6

1834 Points ∼63%

Motorola Moto G5s

1199 Points ∼41% -35%

ZTE Blade V9

1841 Points ∼64% 0%

Honor 9 Lite

1748 Points ∼lx% -v%

Nokia 6 2018

1738 Points ∼60% -5%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

1522 Points ∼53% -17%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

2132 Points ∼74% +16%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1860, n=fourteen)

1790 Points ∼62% -2%

Average of grade Smartphone (688 - 5318, northward=207, last 2 years)

2895 Points ∼100% +58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.seven
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

20 fps ∼xxx%

Motorola Moto G5s

xvi fps ∼24% -20%

ZTE Bract V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor 9 Lite

18 fps ∼27% -10%

Nokia 6 2018

31 fps ∼46% +55%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

12 fps ∼18% -twoscore%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

22 fps ∼33% +10%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (xx - 34, n=13)

28.one fps ∼42% +41%

Average of grade Smartphone (9.v - 143, north=215, last 2 years)

66.seven fps ∼100% +234%

1920x1080 T-King Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

22 fps ∼17%

Motorola Moto G5s

sixteen fps ∼12% -27%

ZTE Bract V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Laurels ix Light

19 fps ∼14% -14%

Nokia half dozen 2018

30 fps ∼23% +36%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

12 fps ∼9% -45%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

23 fps ∼18% +v%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=13)

21.8 fps ∼17% -1%

Boilerplate of class Smartphone (half-dozen - 428, due north=215, last 2 years)

131.1 fps ∼100% +496%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

8.ix fps ∼17%

Motorola Moto G5s

7.four fps ∼14% -17%

ZTE Bract V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor nine Lite

8.4 fps ∼16% -6%

Nokia half dozen 2018

15 fps ∼28% +69%

Samsung Milky way J7 2017

five.1 fps ∼9% -43%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

ix.6 fps ∼18% +8%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, north=13)

13.9 fps ∼26% +56%

Boilerplate of class Smartphone (4.v - 121, n=214, final 2 years)

53.9 fps ∼100% +506%

1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

9.4 fps ∼13%

Motorola Moto G5s

7.1 fps ∼ix% -24%

ZTE Bract V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor 9 Calorie-free

8.6 fps ∼xi% -9%

Nokia vi 2018

fourteen fps ∼19% +49%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

5.1 fps ∼7% -46%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

9.viii fps ∼13% +4%

Boilerplate Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.ii - 9.4, northward=13)

9.3 fps ∼12% -i%

Average of grade Smartphone (1 - 251, n=216, last ii years)

75 fps ∼100% +698%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort past value)
Motorola Moto G6

5.8 fps ∼14%

Motorola Moto G5s

5 fps ∼12% -14%

ZTE Blade V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor nine Light

5 fps ∼12% -14%

Nokia vi 2018

x fps ∼24% +72%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

3.2 fps ∼8% -45%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro

six.3 fps ∼15% +9%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=xiii)

ix.98 fps ∼24% +72%

Average of class Smartphone (three.ane - 121, north=213, last 2 years)

41.seven fps ∼100% +619%

1920x1080 Manhattan ES iii.one Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

six.i fps ∼12%

Motorola Moto G5s

four.6 fps ∼9% -25%

ZTE Blade V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor 9 Lite

3.2 fps ∼six% -48%

Nokia vi 2018

9.8 fps ∼xix% +61%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

iii.iii fps ∼6% -46%

BQ Aquaris 10 Pro

6.4 fps ∼12% +five%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - six.9, n=13)

half dozen.15 fps ∼12% +i%

Boilerplate of course Smartphone (one.4 - 169, n=214, terminal ii years)

51.iii fps ∼100% +741%

GFXBench
on screen Machine Hunt Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6

3.3 fps ∼13%

Motorola Moto G5s

2.7 fps ∼10% -eighteen%

ZTE Blade V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor 9 Light

2.9 fps ∼11% -12%

Nokia 6 2018

v.9 fps ∼23% +79%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

1.9 fps ∼7% -42%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

three.5 fps ∼13% +half-dozen%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=13)

5.4 fps ∼21% +64%

Boilerplate of class Smartphone (3.iii - 81, northward=213, final two years)

26.two fps ∼100% +694%

1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort past value)
Motorola Moto G6

3.4 fps ∼xi%

Motorola Moto G5s

ii.v fps ∼8% -26%

ZTE Blade V9

fps ∼0% -100%

Honor ix Lite

three.2 fps ∼10% -6%

Nokia half dozen 2018

5.six fps ∼18% +65%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

1.9 fps ∼six% -44%

BQ Aquaris X Pro

3.v fps ∼11% +3%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.iii - iii.6, n=13)

3.44 fps ∼11% +one%

Average of class Smartphone (ane.eight - 96.half dozen, n=213, terminal 2 years)

31 fps ∼100% +812%

Legend

Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Wink

ZTE Blade V9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor nine Light HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Wink

Using the preinstalled Chrome 66 browser, you tin surf quite fast on the web. In the benchmarks, the Moto G6 is at the same level as the ZTE Bract V9 and is only browbeaten by the competitors with stronger SoCs.

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=198, last 2 years)

107.half-dozen Points ∼100% +377%

Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)

28.17 Points ∼26% +25%

BQ Aquaris Ten Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)

26.84 Points ∼25% +19%

Honor nine Lite (Chrome 63)

26.42 Points ∼25% +17%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.iv)

25.97 Points ∼24% +15%

Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)

22.56 Points ∼21%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13)

22.iv Points ∼21% -1%

ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)

22.01 Points ∼xx% -ii%

Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)

18.66 Points ∼17% -17%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of course Smartphone (1986 - 65969, n=206, last 2 years)

21544 Points ∼100% +446%

Nokia vi 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)

4993 Points ∼23% +27%

Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)

4742 Points ∼22% +twenty%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)

4560 Points ∼21% +16%

BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)

4424 Points ∼21% +12%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, due north=14)

3981 Points ∼18% +1%

ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.eighteen)

3969 Points ∼18% +i%

Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)

3943 Points ∼xviii%

Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)

3035 Points ∼xiv% -23%

Mozilla Kraken one.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)

13057 ms * ∼100% -11%

ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser ane.ii.18)

11863 ms * ∼91% -1%

Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)

11751 ms * ∼90%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, northward=14)

11506 ms * ∼88% +two%

Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)

10250 ms * ∼79% +thirteen%

Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)

9923 ms * ∼76% +sixteen%

BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)

8742 ms * ∼67% +26%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)

6821 ms * ∼52% +42%

Average of grade Smartphone (414 - 29635, due north=208, terminal 2 years)

3406 ms * ∼26% +71%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (166 - 285, n=8, last ii years)

132.iii Points ∼100% +47%

Nokia half-dozen 2018

117 Points ∼88% +30%

Honor 9 Low-cal (Chrome 63)

108 Points ∼82% +20%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, northward=seven)

97 Points ∼73% +viii%

ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.ii.eighteen)

90 Points ∼68% 0%

Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)

90 Points ∼68%

BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)

86 Points ∼65% -four%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser five.4)

75 Points ∼57% -17%

Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)

61 Points ∼46% -32%

* ... smaller is better

In straight comparison, the 32 GB eMMC storage of the Motorola Moto G6 is relatively fast and merely beaten past the Laurels 9 Lite. After the showtime startup, at that place is yet 25.35 GB of bachelor storage for the user, since the firmware together with the preinstalled apps use but half-dozen.65 GB.

We test the speed of the microSD card slot with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card (max. read: 270 MB/southward, write: 150 MB/s). Even though the transfer rates are decent, the potential of the storage card is not fully used and the Moto G6 comes in last in the comparison field in this discipline.

Motorola Moto G6 Motorola Moto G5s ZTE Blade V9 Honor 9 Lite Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 BQ Aquaris Ten Pro Average 32 GB eMMC Flash Boilerplate of course Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-thirteen%

-19%

11%

-35%

-18%

-23%

135%

Sequential Read 256KB

238.ii

259

9%

265.4

xi%

269.half dozen

xiii%

198.v

-17%

270.5

14%

240 ?(25.8 - 452, n=231)

1%

884 ?(45.half dozen - 2037, n=270, concluding 2 years)

271%

Sequential Write 256KB

117.2

77.5

-34%

119.4

2%

138.2

18%

53

-55%

139.6

xix%

98.2 ?(14.8 - 188.vii, n=231)

-16%

425 ?(11.ix - 1465, n=270, last 2 years)

263%

Random Read 4KB

69.9

40.half dozen

-42%

29.81

-57%

68.four

-2%

25.86

-63%

37.97

-46%

42.three ?(iii.59 - 117.2, n=231)

-39%

156.9 ?(13.five - 325, north=270, last two years)

124%

Random Write 4KB

59.9

46.ii

-23%

12.47

-79%

66.8

12%

10.54

-82%

12.07

-lxxx%

20.half dozen ?(0.75 - 89.5, northward=231)

-66%

150.2 ?(5.5 - 449, north=270, last two years)

151%

Sequential Read 256KB SDCard

75.three ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

84.i ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

12%

83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

11%

83.i ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

ten%

76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

1%

78.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)

5%

71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, due north=178)

-v%

77.6 ?(25.5 - 153.eight, n=96, terminal two years)

3%

Sequential Write 256KB SDCard

61.v ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

ane%

62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

1%

71.nine ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

17%

63.nine ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)

4%

49.77 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)

-19%

52.9 ?(3.four - 87.i, north=178)

-14%

59.five ?(12.9 - 83.3, n=96, last ii years)

-3%

Games - Stronger than the Moto G5

The graphics acceleration in the Motorola Moto G six is handled by a Qualcomm Adreno 506, which has a nominal clock speed of up to 650 MHz, but according to the manufacturer specifications runs at just 600 MHz. However, the performance offered past the mid-range GPU is on the expected level. We evaluate the frame rates with GameBench using current games. The "Asphalt 8" racing game still runs to a large extent smoothly even at loftier details, which had not been the example with the Adreno 505 of the Moto G5. Simply there are besides some short drops with the new graphics unit of measurement, which show equally a brusque stutter in the game. With hardware intensive games in item such every bit "Loonshit of Valor" or "PUBG", this can get abrasive during the game, which points us towards using lowest graphic settings. We as well tested the game with medium settings, but unfortunately the frame rates are and then not recorded for some unknown reason. While you tin can keep to play, there are some noticeable stutters occasionally. For all three games, the load times are noticeably longer than in smartphones with more powerful SoCs.

In the test, the position sensor of the Moto G6 is fast to react and precise, and also the touchscreen gives no reason for complaint. Moreover, the speaker within the ear slice is positioned well, and then that it does not even get covered accidentally when things become hectic.

Asphalt viii: Airborne
Settings Value
high 29 fps
very low thirty fps

  Your browser does non support the canvass element!

Arena of Valor
Settings Value
min 31 fps
loftier HD 30 fps

  Your browser does non back up the sheet chemical element!

PUBG Mobile
Settings Value
Smoothen 26 fps

  Your browser does not support the sheet chemical element!

Emissions - Cool Moto smartphone with decent speakers

Temperature

The surface temperatures of the Motorola Moto G6 remain comfortably depression, and only a small area of the smartphone warms up to body temperature. Information technology is also positive that the values inappreciably increase during constant load.

With the aid of the GFXBench bombardment test, we evaluate the behavior of the SoC during prolonged load. But neither in the T-Rex examination scenario (OpenGL ES 2.0), nor in the more power hungry Manhattan test (OpenGL ES 3.i) does the Moto show any weaknesses, delivering an even performance constantly.

31.5 °C
89 F
31.7 °C
89 F
32 °C
xc F
32.2 °C
xc F
32.seven °C
91 F
36.4 °C
98 F
31.nine °C
89 F
32.half-dozen °C
91 F
35.vi °C
96 F
Maximum: 36.four °C = 98 F
Average: 33 °C = 91 F
30.ane °C
86 F
30.8 °C
87 F
31.one °C
88 F
30.v °C
87 F
31.6 °C
89 F
30.9 °C
88 F
29.7 °C
85 F
31.8 °C
89 F
thirty.6 °C
87 F
Maximum: 31.8 °C = 89 F
Average: xxx.eight °C = 87 F

Ability Supply (max.)  24.six °C = 76 F | Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | Voltcraft IR-260

30.8 °C
87 F
31.2 °C
88 F
31.9 °C
89 F
31.iii °C
88 F
31.8 °C
89 F
35.8 °C
96 F
31.4 °C
89 F
31.8 °C
89 F
34.vii °C
94 F
Maximum: 35.8 °C = 96 F
Average: 32.3 °C = 90 F
thirty.1 °C
86 F
xxx.4 °C
87 F
30.9 °C
88 F
xxx.i °C
86 F
31.2 °C
88 F
xxx.vii °C
87 F
29.5 °C
85 F
31.iii °C
88 F
thirty.vi °C
87 F
Maximum: 31.3 °C = 88 F
Average: 30.5 °C = 87 F

Power Supply (max.)  23.3 °C = 74 F | Room Temperature xx.6 °C = 69 F | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.four °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the course Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.eight °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 32.iii °C / xc F, compared to the device boilerplate of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Moto G6: Pink-Noise curves
Pink-Noise curves

The speaker of the Moto G6 is located in the earpiece of the smartphone, so it does not go covered even when information technology is lying on the tabular array. At medium volume, it offers a relatively balanced and pleasant sound. Unfortunately, the Moto G6 is unable to maintain this at a high book, since the high notes become more prevalent then, causing information technology to sound tinny.

Despite having a USB Blazon-C, the Motorola smartphone still offers a headphone jack, which outputs the sound cleanly and with a low level of dissonance. The USB port offers no audio capabilities.

dB(A) 0 10 20 30 forty fifty 60 70 80 90 Deep Bass Eye Bass High Bass Lower Range Mids Higher Mids Lower Highs Mid Highs Upper Highs Super Highs twenty 36.five 37.eight 25 38.2 33.half-dozen 31 35.viii 36.1 40 29 37.five l 34 36.3 63 33.viii 30.1 80 27.2 30.4 100 28.half-dozen 27.9 125 28.nine 33.four 160 27.7 48.3 200 26.6 52 250 21.viii 60.8 315 22.5 62.8 400 21.3 63.3 500 21.4 66.vii 630 xix.one 68.three 800 xviii.9 66.vii 1000 xix.vii 68.9 1250 18.7 72.seven 1600 xviii.4 71.1 2000 19.one 73.2 2500 18.six 76.nine 3150 nineteen.8 78.6 4000 19.5 78 5000 xix.2 78.8 6300 19 77.ane 8000 19.1 75.iv 10000 19.3 75.5 12500 19.9 71.nine 16000 xix.viii 61.8 SPL 31.7 87.iv N 1.7 lxx median xix.7 median 68.9 Delta 1.9 vii.2 28.6 23.five 24.ix 21.vii 24.6 21.9 26.4 22.6 30.eight 31.4 23.half dozen 22.9 20.2 18.6 xix.nine 20.half dozen 17.6 22.3 19.1 35.6 xix.1 36.six 17.4 43.9 16.9 51.2 sixteen.8 54.iii 15.1 56.8 xvi.5 57.9 15.6 63 15 66 xv.5 65.3 15.3 68.ii xv.7 69 fifteen.5 73.8 xv.5 73.4 15.4 73.four 15.viii 73.8 16 72.1 15.eight 72.iv sixteen.1 71.vi 16.i 68.one 17.iii 54.5 27.nine 82.nine 1 51.3 median xvi median 65.3 0.6 13.6 31.6 30.8 25.four 30.5 25.3 31.2 32.ix thirty.7 33.vi 31.7 31.vi 28.viii 28.4 22.6 27 26 twenty.8 36.8 22 xl.2 21.3 49.2 20.8 53.7 21.2 57.one nineteen.4 62.6 19.5 67.4 17.seven 67.8 17.9 69.five 17.8 70.7 17.3 72.1 17.4 74.6 16.7 75.2 17.two 75.5 xviii.two 77.9 17.ix 81.4 17.vi 79 17.seven 75.6 17.8 75.4 17.9 71.3 xviii.1 62.6 18.2 55.8 xxx 87.1 1.3 70.5 median 17.ix median 69.5 ane.iii 10.6 hearing range hibernate median Pinkish Noise Motorola Moto G6 ZTE Bract V9 Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

Frequency diagram (checkboxes tin be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers tin can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - simply 2.half dozen% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.iii% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs ii - xvi kHz
(±) | college highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.ix% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% divergence to median)
Compared to aforementioned class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The all-time had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, vii% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was xx%, worst was 65%

ZTE Blade V9 audio assay

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | near no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (eleven% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.six% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (four.nine% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - xvi kHz
(±) | college highs - on average 7.7% college than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.iv% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - sixteen.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% divergence to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this form were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were amend, 5% like, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of three%, average was xx%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | well-nigh no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | counterbalanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs two - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.one% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is boilerplate (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% like, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, boilerplate was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% like, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was xx%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - Efficient smartphone with a good bombardment life

Energy Consumption

While the power consumption of the Motorola Moto G6 has improved particularly under load, at maximum brightness the new display draws more ability from the battery, which was to be expected due to the larger panel surface. However, the smartphone is more efficient than its predecessor, which tin can mainly be traced dorsum to the more than efficient Snapdragon processor.

The Moto G6 supports Motorola's TurboPower charging standard, which is based on USB-PD. The box includes the corresponding fast charger (fifteen watts). With it, the battery tin exist fully recharged inside 95 minutes, with fifty percentage being reached after 30 minutes, and 80 percent after 53 minutes.

Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
ZTE Bract V9
3200 mAh
Laurels nine Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris 10 Pro
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
Average of class Smartphone
Ability Consumption

-22%

-iii%

-20%

-4%

35%

-23%

-33%

-40%

Idle Minimum *

0.half-dozen

0.67

-12%

0.71

-18%

0.85

-42%

0.67

-12%

0.39

35%

0.67

-12%

0.794 ?(0.51 - 1.26, n=xiv)

-32%

0.928 ?(0.12 - 2.5, due north=219, last ii years)

-55%

Idle Boilerplate *

1.81

1.iv

23%

one.73

4%

two

-ten%

ane.76

3%

i.06

41%

1.7

six%

2.27 ?(0.96 - 4.45, northward=xiv)

-25%

1.726 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=219, last ii years)

5%

Idle Maximum *

ane.86

ane.52

18%

i.78

4%

two.04

-10%

1.78

4%

1.08

42%

ane.78

4%

two.48 ?(0.99 - 4.51, n=14)

-33%

1.96 ?(0.69 - 4, n=219, last 2 years)

-5%

Load Average *

two.78

4.56

-64%

ii.74

1%

3.23

-16%

2.82

-1%

ane.82

35%

4.42

-59%

3.95 ?(i.85 - 7.1, northward=fourteen)

-42%

4.51 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=219, last 2 years)

-62%

Load Maximum *

4.04

7.05

-75%

iv.36

-viii%

four.93

-22%

4.56

-13%

3.21

21%

vi.3

-56%

5.38 ?(3.04 - 8.8, due north=14)

-33%

vii.41 ?(3.56 - 12.three, n=219, last 2 years)

-83%

* ... smaller is amend

Battery Life

The bombardment of the Moto G6 offers 3000 mAh and with that is the same size as that in the Moto G5s. Despite the larger brandish, the battery life of the new smartphone remains on a similar level. Merely when playing videos or reading does the G6 demand a little more power, while the runtime turns out slightly better during surfing on the WLAN and that under load fifty-fifty increases noticeably.

However, the Bract V9 shows that it can be done even better while surfing on the WLAN, offering a battery life that is 43 percent longer in the examination than the Moto G6. This tin can only be partially traced back to the slightly more powerful battery. Overall, the Moto smartphone offers a good battery life that should easily final for a day.

Bombardment Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min effulgence) 19h 30min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 66) 9h 13min
Big Cadet Bunny H.264 1080p 10h 00min
Load (maximum effulgence) 5h 38min

Pros

+ brilliant high-contrast display

+ dual SIM and microSD expansion

+ good dual camera

+ attractive design

+ reliable GPS

+ good phonation quality

Cons

- drinking glass back attracts dirt and is slippery

- low WLAN range

- only LTE Cat. 4

Verdict

Testing the Motorola Moto G6. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
Testing the Motorola Moto G6. Exam unit provided by Motorola Germany.

After just half dozen month, Motorola offers its latest addition of the popular Chiliad series to the customers. With a new display, drinking glass back, a dual camera, and the new Snapdragon 450, the jump turns out larger than that betwixt the Moto G5 and the G5s earlier.

Nosotros also take to emphasize positively that the manufacturer has not increased the toll. With a price of 249 Euros (~$298; around $250 in the US) at market introduction, it is still quite close to some more powerfully equipped competitors that have been available for a while, such every bit the BQ Aquaris X Pro or the in-house Moto X4, for example. Nevertheless, this volition change in the next few months when the toll will drop slowly.

Visually, the Motorola Moto G6 looks similar a Moto X4 Light and keeps many positive characteristics of its larger sibling model.

In the test, the Moto G6 mainly convinces with its practiced dual camera and the mod, bonny design. Although the smartphone is only bachelor in i color at the time of the test, we discover it very attractive. In improver, the display can exist actually bright and offers a stiff contrast ratio, and the battery life is more than decent.

We were not always happy with the quality of the WLAN connection during the test, since the quality of the connection was varying even in close proximity to the router and the range dropped rapidly if in that location was a wall between the smartphone and the router. Overall, the Motorola Moto G6 represents a successful update.

Motorola Moto G6 - 2018-05-07 05/07/2018 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

xl /sixty → 67%

Games Performance

27 /63 → 42%

Application Performance

47 /seventy → 67%

Smartphone - Weighted Boilerplate

Pricecompare

Daniel Schmidt

Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - 435 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

Equally a kid I was fascinated past my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext organization and later on the Earth Broad Spider web. I have always been captivated past the latest technologies, and this is specially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I've been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I'm looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and beingness with my family.

Delight share our article, every link counts!

Daniel Schmidt, 2018-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-nineteen)

talmadgedevell.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-G6-Smartphone-Review.303202.0.html

0 Response to "Motorola Moto G6 Xt1925 32gb Dual Sim (Factory Unlocked) Android Gsm 12mp 57 Review"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel